Friday, August 20, 2010

Does anybody know about John Peters who was involved in the gulf war?

How does he fit in the category triumph and tragedy?


What happened to him and what did he do?


Websites about him?


Facts about John Peters please...



Why are people still buying into Holyfield's delusions that he has a shot?

He has no shot, because he is shot. Has been for quite a while.



I love stories of triumph over adversity as much as the next guy - I loved 'Rudy' and 'The Natural' - but there comes a time when reality has to intercede.



I've been a fan of Holyfield's since the eighties, but at 43, and with too many wars behind him, he is his own worst enemy.



Evander has not beaten a viable opponent since Hasim Rachman in '02, and was actually suspended after his dismal performance against Larry Donald.two years ago.



Anyone who has a rudimentary understanding of the sport of boxing can take one look at him and know he's a tragedy waiting to happen, yet since he beat an insurance salesman several weeks ago, a fair number of people actually think he can chase these windmills successfully. Don Quixote would be proud.



He's NOT going to be a George Foreman, because he doesn't have Foreman's size and strength advantage.



However, America is a free country - he can destroy himself if he wants.



Why are people still buying into Holyfield's delusions that he has a shot?free spyware remover



Its Boxing! Anything can happen! Less credibility than wrestling!!!!



Why are people still buying into Holyfield's delusions that he has a shot?ktm

Who wrote the fable of the little boy in an imaginary world of monsters?

I saw a T-shirt of these characters the other day and I remembered reading the fable, i think its a fable, but I couldn't remember the name of it or the author. I know the little boy is in pajamas and the monsters are carrying him in a position of triumph or celebration in one of the pictures.



Who wrote the fable of the little boy in an imaginary world of monsters?free spyware remobal



''Where the Wild Things Are''. The kid's name is Max. Author is Maurice Sendak...I own TWO of those t-shirts because it was one of my favorite books as a kid...now if I could just find a shirt with ''Brown Mouse and Vole'' on it!



Who wrote the fable of the little boy in an imaginary world of monsters?kawasaki



rosco I just heard you here...check this news!



http://www.osoq.com/funstuff/extra/extra...

Is ';State Sovereignty'; a valid reason for NOT invading Iraq and Afghanistan?

Why do people decree ''State Sovereignty'' a reason for not deposing Saddam ??



The most ridiculous argument an activist or diplomat can make in defense of a dictator like Saddam Hussein is that the tyrant cannot be deposed because of his nation Sovereignty. The notion that America did not have the authority to overthrow one of the worst dictators (over 1,000,000 civilians killed during his reign ) that ever walked the face of the earth because of state sovereignty is absurd.



Based on that logic : Nazi Germany, Imperial Japan, Kosovo, Bosnia, Rwanda, Sudan are unable to be touched because they too are sovereign nations.



The genocide in Rwanda, for example, has been mourned theatrically in retrospect 鈥?Europeans especially will weep over corpses, but will do nothing to protect those still alive. In America we call this cowardice!



The sole purpose for any government is to protect its citizens. A state that kills its own people has no legitimacy! NO MATTER WHAT THE TYRANNT RIDDEN UNITED NATIONS SAYS. Knowing what we all no now about the mass graves and torture chambers, WMD attacks, and countless other severe infractions of鈥?international law鈥? how can any moral person state that Saddam should have been left alone?



Sovereignty cannot be an excuse for uninhibited savagery. Saddam was a HITLER to his people. People who objected to the removal of Saddam Hussein鈥檚 regime on grounds of state sovereignty are the moral descendents of those who looked away from Hitler鈥檚 crimes. The difference today is that those who condone mass murder pose as moral arbiters and demand to know what right America has to decide which governments are tolerable and which are not. The answer is simple. 鈥淲hen the forces for good fail to act, the forces of evil triumph.鈥?And America is the worlds essential force for good. No amount of fashionable anti-Americanism will change that. And though we may not always have the blessing from the rest of the world to depose dictators, tyrants, murderers and terrorists we will surge forward and do what we know is right. The world will be better for it.



  • automatic weapons for hunting
  • offer razor cut hair
  • The conclusion of foundation?

    In the Foundation series, which WILL triumph, The two foundations or Galaxia......?



    Personally, I vouch for the Foundations to be the basis of the new Galactic Empire



    The conclusion of foundation?free anti virus



    Is this what you mean?



    ''The Unwritten Sequel



    Foundation and Earth takes place only some 500 years into the 1,000-year Seldon plan. The ending hints greatly at the next part of the story. As detailed by his wife in It's Been a Good Life, Asimov intended to write a sequel, but his attempts were fruitless. He did not know what to do next. This is why he wrote the prequels (Prelude to Foundation and Forward the Foundation) instead.



    Trevize mentions that no human ship has ever penetrated the Magellanic Clouds, nor the Andromeda Galaxy or galaxies beyond that. Intelligent aliens have been mentioned in the short story Blind Alley. No reason is given why humans have not visited other galaxies, which would seem to be within range of the hyperspace drive.



    The book states several times that the Seldon plan does not take into account alien influences. Combined with the ending (see above), one could surmise that for the sequel, he planned to introduce aliens (almost certainly from another galaxy) who would upset and possibly destroy the Seldon plan. It is also possible that Fallom, combined with Daneel's vast knowledge and influence, but uninhibited by the Three Laws of Robotics, would have turned out to be the enemy of humanity (as the last two paragraphs seem to suggest). However, all his fictional citations from the Encyclopedia Galactica are dated after the formation of the Second Galactic Empire. This meant that there could never be irreparable damage to the plan, since, eventually, it must return to its precalculated path.''

    Where can I find car seat ratings in an easy to read format? I would like to compare them before I b

    We are looking at the Britax line but I would also like to compare some others. The Evenflo Triumph looks so comfortable compared to the Britax.



    I was wondering if I should splurge to get one that holds children up to 65lbs but when I look at the car seat, I don't see how a kid that big could possibly sit comfortable in that small thing! Any advice? Does it convert into something else to hold bigger children or do they just fit in there just fine? Also, do you still use the 5pt harness system or do you use a seat belt in it when they get older. I don't want to waste money if my child won't be comfortable or won't want to sit in something like that when he's bigger.



    Any suggestions or help would be appreciated!



    Where can I find car seat ratings in an easy to read format? I would like to compare them before I buy...?free adware remover



    Consumer Reports is not considered an accurate source of information for carseat ratings. I have gained my best car seat information from reading and asking questions at www.car-seat.org.



    As for the 65 pound Britax seats (Marathon, Decathlon and Boulevard). Yes, they are worth the extra expense. The can be installed rear facing to 33 pounds (extended rear facing - past 20lbs/12 months is highly recommended) and forward face to 65 pounds or until the child's shoulder's are above the highest harness slots - for many kids this could mean until age 5. The 65 pound Britax seats are not 3-in-1 seats, they do not convert to a belt positioning booster once the child has outgrown the harness. There are very few seats on the market that can do both tasks well and none that can rear face, forward face and act as a booster well. They are safe and adequate for all tasks but personally I don't just want safe and adequate for my children - I want safest and best. You will need a booster seat once your child grows out of any harnessed seat, including a 65 lb Britax seat.

    How do you like my poem ';Ode To My Dog Mandi';?

    I love your loving look within those big eyes



    And your warm kisses are sincere



    The way you squeak you toy in triumph



    When you win a tug of war



    That wet black button nose



    And that wagging tail of yours



    I love it when you greet me



    And the twinkle of your toes



    The little bell that rings whenever you come near



    Is a sound I most enjoy to hear



    To see those beautiful brown eyes



    And those cream colored ears



    How do you like my poem ''Ode To My Dog Mandi''?ducati



    I love it - it's very sweet and loving - and perfect just the way it is - right from the heart like a poem should be. There's nothing like a pet to inspire these kinds of lines and verses! :)



    How do you like my poem ''Ode To My Dog Mandi''?hp



    pretty good...interesting....i remember writing a paper on my dog...it was a journal type thing ...the topic was things that are valuable to you..... Well i wrote from the heart because i love my dog and it was kinda personal and my teacher put it up in the back..YIKES...that was also the week the board of administration came to visit ....ya so good luck with your poem
    Awwww.... it is very cute- i know your not in the poetry section- but some tips to make it better (dont take this afensive, its already really goo!)